Rajesh Patel and others v MRD Property Developments Ltd [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: 2012Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2012] EWCA Civ 727, 31 May 2012. Concerns what a landlord needs to provide to a tenant to recover the costs of insurance premiums in a situation where a lease requires provision of a "written demand". Appellant P argued that his lease was wrongly forfeited, claiming that the relevant arrears included insurance rent that had not been demanded. "Held": Appeal dismissed. The court found that the provision of the insurance demand constituted a written demand from the defendant landlord M to the tenants.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 156780-2001 |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
[2012] EWCA Civ 727, 31 May 2012. Concerns what a landlord needs to provide to a tenant to recover the costs of insurance premiums in a situation where a lease requires provision of a "written demand". Appellant P argued that his lease was wrongly forfeited, claiming that the relevant arrears included insurance rent that had not been demanded. "Held": Appeal dismissed. The court found that the provision of the insurance demand constituted a written demand from the defendant landlord M to the tenants.