Lawful use certificate
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1996 EGCS 5 (27/01/96)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: "R v Kensington and Chelsea Royal LBC ex parte Europa Foods Ltd" QBD 15 January 1996. E was a tenant of C who occupied adjoining premises. E sought a new business tenancy but C served a counter-notice that it intended to use the premises for its own business and obtained a certificate of lawful proposed use on the grounds that planning permission for change of use was not required. E sought judicial review against the local planning authority. "Held" that application for judicial review was refused.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3205-50 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 14347-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3203-24 Restriction of tenders unlawful | WB3203-25 Draft landfill monitoring paper | WB3204-08 Right to seek declaration | WB3205-50 Lawful use certificate | WB3205-51 Planning permission | WB3205-53 Architects fees | WB3205-54 Surveyors negligence |
"R v Kensington and Chelsea Royal LBC ex parte Europa Foods Ltd" QBD 15 January 1996. E was a tenant of C who occupied adjoining premises. E sought a new business tenancy but C served a counter-notice that it intended to use the premises for its own business and obtained a certificate of lawful proposed use on the grounds that planning permission for change of use was not required. E sought judicial review against the local planning authority. "Held" that application for judicial review was refused.