Obligation to repair
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1990 127Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: Demetriou v Poolaction Ltd and another CA 24 October 1990. An appeal by landlords concerning a repairing convenant was allowed. It was decided that a repairing covenant was not implied just because there was no express covenant and as the tenant was using the premises for subletting and the tenancy was not residential , the Housing Act 1961 did not apply.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2644-31 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 15206-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2644-28 New leases for pub tenants | WB2644-29 Tenant`s reprieve | WB2644-30 Break clauses | WB2644-31 Obligation to repair | WB2644-32 Determining multiple occupation | WB2644-33 Berlin property | WB2644-34 Business guide to Eastern Europe |
Demetriou v Poolaction Ltd and another CA 24 October 1990. An appeal by landlords concerning a repairing convenant was allowed. It was decided that a repairing covenant was not implied just because there was no express covenant and as the tenant was using the premises for subletting and the tenancy was not residential , the Housing Act 1961 did not apply.