Romain and another v Scuba TV Ltd and others
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1996) 23 EG 126-128(3)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: CA 10 November 1995. R claimed rent arrears from S. The third defendant (X), who acted as guarantor for S, applied to dismiss R`s claim for want of prosecution. The application failed on the grounds that the limitation period of 12 years had not expired. X appealed, contending that the Limitation Act 1980 s19 applied and a claim against a guarantor for rent arrears against a guarantor must be brought within a six year period. "Held" the Limitation ACT 1980 s19 applied. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55381 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 16077-1001 |
CA 10 November 1995. R claimed rent arrears from S. The third defendant (X), who acted as guarantor for S, applied to dismiss R`s claim for want of prosecution. The application failed on the grounds that the limitation period of 12 years had not expired. X appealed, contending that the Limitation Act 1980 s19 applied and a claim against a guarantor for rent arrears against a guarantor must be brought within a six year period. "Held" the Limitation ACT 1980 s19 applied. Appeal allowed.