Image from Google Jackets

Smith and another v Kent CC

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1995] 44 EG 141-146(6)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: LT 10 February 1995. It was decided that whilst the compulsory purchase of a section of front garden to widen the A20 would not have a serious effect on amenity, the claimants` blight notice was upheld as they would suffer a reduction in privacy from the loss of existing trees and the execution of works would impede pedestrian and vehicular access.

LT 10 February 1995. It was decided that whilst the compulsory purchase of a section of front garden to widen the A20 would not have a serious effect on amenity, the claimants` blight notice was upheld as they would suffer a reduction in privacy from the loss of existing trees and the execution of works would impede pedestrian and vehicular access.