A cause, but no effect
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0101) 6 January 2001, 81(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Discusses how "Egan Lawson Ltd v Standard Life Assurance Co" (CA, Abs63600) highlights further difficulties for non-retained agents trying to secure an introductory commission; an agent must be the effective cause of the subsequent sale to secure payment.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3702-22 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 110310-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3702-18 Housing studies | WB3702-20 Countrywide invests in conveyancing | WB3702-21 Brum firms form giant practice | WB3702-22 A cause, but no effect | WB3702-23 Slump for retail | WB3702-24 New council tax band | WB3702-25 No place for SRB |
Discusses how "Egan Lawson Ltd v Standard Life Assurance Co" (CA, Abs63600) highlights further difficulties for non-retained agents trying to secure an introductory commission; an agent must be the effective cause of the subsequent sale to secure payment.