Guidance on costs order

Series: RICS News Service ; 17 June 2002, (2)Publication details: 2002Subject(s):

Summary: In considering Excelsior Commercial & Industrial Holdings Ltd v Salisbury Hamer Aspden & Johnson Betesh & Co, the Court of Appeal declined to offer guidance on costs order. Judges ruled that the circumstances in which a court may be concerned with costs and payments may vary considerably as an infinite variety of situations existed that might go to court justifying the making of a cost order.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
News article	London News article	WB3822-02 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	118441-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	WB3821-24 RICS certification in valuation	WB3821-25 Municipal waste rising but landfilled proportion falling	WB3822-01 Confidence back following september 11th	WB3822-02 Guidance on costs order	WB3822-03 Commercial demand hits four-year low	WB3822-04 UK Economic Brief - June 2002	WB3822-05 CBI survey and manufacturing recovery	Next

In considering Excelsior Commercial & Industrial Holdings Ltd v Salisbury Hamer Aspden & Johnson Betesh & Co, the Court of Appeal declined to offer guidance on costs order. Judges ruled that the circumstances in which a court may be concerned with costs and payments may vary considerably as an infinite variety of situations existed that might go to court justifying the making of a cost order.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)