Update commercial property
Language: English Series: Solicitors Journal Property Focus ; June 2010, 23-24, (2)Publication details: 2010Subject(s): Summary: Goldacre v Nortel, [2009] EWHC 3389 (Ch) (see L149729) treats the issue of administrators' liability for rent. The right to break after transferring property interests is dealt with in Linpac v Aviva [2010] EWCA Civ 395. Clarence House v National Westminster Bank [2009] EWCA Civ 1311 (see E149610) makes clear that virtual assignments do not affect the normal landlord's remedies. Good Harvest Partnership LLP v Centaur Services [2010] EWHC 330 (Ch) severely restricts the ability of landlords to rely on the covenant strength of existing guarantors to guarantee the performance of subsequent assignees.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L150421 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 150421-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Goldacre v Nortel, [2009] EWHC 3389 (Ch) (see L149729) treats the issue of administrators' liability for rent. The right to break after transferring property interests is dealt with in Linpac v Aviva [2010] EWCA Civ 395. Clarence House v National Westminster Bank [2009] EWCA Civ 1311 (see E149610) makes clear that virtual assignments do not affect the normal landlord's remedies. Good Harvest Partnership LLP v Centaur Services [2010] EWHC 330 (Ch) severely restricts the ability of landlords to rely on the covenant strength of existing guarantors to guarantee the performance of subsequent assignees.